I often hear from non-religious people, especially from the New Atheist camp, something along the lines of “well, if you showed me proper evidence I might change my beliefs”. This, I think, is total bullshit. What a scientifically-minded, rational person would consider proper evidence must go through a rigorous test of possible causes and interpretations.
Now, I am going to venture that the only real kind of evidence for God, or some other metaphysical or supernatural phenomenon, would be a direct experience of the thing in question. Most people who claim religious knowledge describe this very thing: “God talked to me” or “Mary appeared to me in a vision”. Encounters with the divine in the Bible follow the same lines –think of the burning bush. Otherwise, there has been no physical evidence for the supernatural that is not continually debunked.
When it comes to interpretation of experience, Modern Man usually knows better than to trust himself. We live in a post-Freudian world afterall, where we know to not always trust our own consciousnesses or experiences. The sub-conscious can play tricks on the conscious. Furthermore, we now know that we live in an environment full of mind-altering chemicals, from bread mold to spray paint to methamphetamine.
Imagine, if you will, that you were to have the following experience:
You are laying in your bed reading a book, ready to fall asleep, when all of the sudden there is a flash of light and a bearded man in a robe appears in front of you. You can barely see his face because everything is so illuminated. He speaks to you in a language that you cannot understand, then the room begins to melt away and you lose consciousness. When you wake, you are in your bed, book in hand, and a few minutes, say ten or fifteen, have passed.
So, if I had an experience like the one stated above, that we might consider experiential evidence for the divine, I, and probably any other non-religious person of sound mind, would consider the following interpretations in the following order, assuming I am still rational:
1. The phenomenon experienced is actually real, but I just interpreted it incorrectly. (Think UFO sightings)
2. Drug hallucination – Someone has spiked my drink with acid. (Delusion caused by something external to myself)
3. Sudden and severe schizophrenia and/or some other madness. (Internal delusion)
4. I am dreaming, or am having a strange memory.
5. The phenomenon is real and I have interpreted it correctly.
As you see, number five would be the only interpretation that would lead me to conclude that there actually is a God (or ghosts or fairies, et cetera). Many people, I think, jump to interpretation number five before considering the other possibilities that are much more likely.
Perhaps what separates the religious mentality from the non-religious is the level of willingness to trust your own experience of the strange and unknown.
